CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 60% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
About Our Global Companies


Valutrades Limited - a company incorporated in England with company number 07939901. View more information here.
Valutrades (Seychelles) Limited - a company incorporated in the Seychelles with company number 8423648-1.


Regulated by the FCA (Fincancial Conduct Authority). Financial Services Register Number 586541.
Regulated by the FSA (Financial Services Authority). Regulatory Number SD028.

Max Leverage

30:1 (or up to 500:1 for Professional clients, click here to find out more about professional client status)
Up to 500:1


United Kingdom

Negative Balance Protection


Back to Blog

Exponential Moving Average vs Simple Moving Average: What's the Difference?


simple-moving-average (1)

Moving averages are one of the most popular tools that forex traders lean on when attempting to understand market movements because they add an extra layer to any chart analysis you’re conducting, highlighting exactly where the price action is happening.

Based on pure popularity, the exponential moving average (EMA) and the simple moving average (SMA) are the two most common moving average tools. But there are differences between the two.

What Is a Simple Moving Average?

Long before the rise of internet-based trading, the simple moving average was already well established due to its ease of calculation. This is the reasoning behind the name “simple” moving average. An SMA is the average of the closing prices for the time period highlighted. 

On a 20-day SMA, for example, the moving average is the average asset price in that particular date range. The purpose of the SMA is to overlay a chart with long-term price trends to see how current prices compare to a long-term average. In general, longer-term SMAs are more slowly affected by dramatic price swings, whereas shorter-term SMAs will be faster to respond.

Here’s a look at the 50-, 100-, and 200-day SMAs on a CHF/JPY chart. Notice how the 50-day line (in yellow) features more dramatic movements than both the 100-day (in brown) and the 200-day (in purple) lines:


Generally speaking, an SMA is calculated using daily closing prices, but it is possible to use other time frames as well, even if they aren’t common. Additional price data, such as the median price and opening price, can also be utilized. At the end of the new price period, that data is added to the calculation, and the oldest price data in the series is eliminated.

SMAs are popular for their ability to easily illustrate the long-term trends of securities over time. If the line is trending up, the security is strengthening, whereas a downward trend shows a weakening of that security. 

Although it can be a useful tool for evaluating a currency pair, the SMA also has limitations due to its reliance on historical data. As a lagging indicator, the data used to create an SMA may already be outdated and less reliable by the time you’re able to view it in a trend line.

Exponential Moving Average vs Simple Moving Average_ What’s the Difference_

What Is an Exponential Moving Average?

Based on the SMA, the EMA gives more importance to recent prices, even if the rate of the decrease between the current price and its preceding price is inconsistent. Think about it this way: Of all moving averages, the exponential moving average is the most “in the moment” because it focuses on the most recent data points.

EMAs are more complicated to calculate because prices closer to the present day receive more weight in the calculation than older prices. This is one benefit of the EMA over the SMA: It leans more heavily on recent historical data, rather than giving equal weight to every price within a range. For that reason, the EMA responds faster to price changes in a currency pair.

Below, you will see 20-, 50-, 100-, and 200-day EMA lines on the same CHF/JPY chart as before. Notice how the EMA lines are much more volatile than the lines created by the SMA. This volatility demonstrates the adjusted influence given to recent price changes, which can cause a sudden spike or drop to have an immediate impact on the EMA:


The obvious advantage of the EMA is that the data is newer, which means that the insights gained from this indicator are more likely to be relevant for traders. But even though more recent data is given additional weight, EMAs still represent lagging data, and some traders may simply be uninterested in using historical information to guide future trading decisions—especially when so many different factors can affect currency prices.

But the EMA is more complex than the SMA, which is easier for beginning traders to pick up. At the same time, traders focused on a long-term strategy may be fine with the even weight of the SMA, because they’re looking at a bigger picture.

Understanding the Key Differences

You might think that there’s a wealth of differences between EMAs and SMAs, but that isn’t actually the case. The key difference between them is the sensitivity each one shows to shifts in data within its calculations. The EMA places a heavy focus on recent prices, whereas the SMA assigns equal weighting to all values. Both EMAs and SMAs are generally interpreted in the same way, with both used by technically focused traders to smooth out price fluctuations.

The sheer nature of the EMA means that it turns faster than the SMA, and as such, its effectiveness is determined by the period the trader chooses.

Generally, many traders believe that the EMA edges the SMA, but choosing one over the other depends on what it will be used for.

It’s good to be familiar with both of these indicators, but time will tell whether the EMA or SMA should play a significant role in your trade evaluation strategy. Some traders rely on these indicators heavily, especially when paired with other indicators and chart patterns. Others may go in a different direction and steer clear of the EMA and SMA entirely.

When to Use a Simple Moving Average

Some may question the use of SMAs these days, but the reality is that they still hold up. What makes them so strong and continually relevant is their versatility. The best way to make use of SMAs is to identify reversals and trends, measure the strength of an asset's momentum, and determine potential areas where an asset will find resistance or support. 

The ability to create custom SMA time frames is also beneficial to traders, because they can take several views of a currency pair’s performance over time as they predict future price movements that may occur. Again, SMAs aren’t the most complicated or sophisticated technical indicator in the world, but they can still provide value as part of a trading strategy.

When to Use an Exponential Moving Average

EMAs are largely used as a confirmation measure, so they seldom function independently. Many traders use them alongside other indicators to confirm major market moves, validating their legitimacy along the way. If you add the EMA to your arsenal of indicators, it’s unlikely to be the first tool you use to evaluate a new trading opportunity. But you may find value in this indicator as you use it to test a hypothesis about a trade, or to corroborate or dispute the suggestions made by other indicators.

For traders who lean more on fast-moving markets, EMAs are considered to be highly applicable because they can do a great job of determining trading bias. If you gravitate toward these markets, you may end up using EMAs in a similar way.


When it comes to indicators, there is no getting away from the sheer commonality of EMAs and SMAs. Any forex trader, no matter their experience level, should be making use of moving averages. Although neither is better or worse than the other, understanding the difference between the two is the key, even if they’re not worlds apart. 

With that knowledge in mind, it comes down to determining which moving average suits your trading approach, so take this information on board—and don’t be afraid to put it into practice.

New call-to-action


The information provided herein is for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended and should not be construed to constitute advice. If such information is acted upon by you then this should be solely at your discretion and Valutrades will not be held accountable in any way.

This post was written by Graeme Watkins

CEO Valutrades Limited, Graeme Watkins is an FX and CFD market veteran with more than 10 years experience. Key roles include management, senior systems and controls, sales, project management and operations. Graeme has help significant roles for both brokerages and technology platforms.